Super Tuesday Results for Planning and Land Use Votes — Blogs

While the Demo­c­ra­t­ic pri­ma­ry steals all the head­lines, those con­cerned about the direc­tion of land use, trans­porta­tion, and hous­ing poli­cies has plen­ty to watch in Cal­i­for­nia on Super Tues­day, both at the state and the local lev­el. 

A few key take­aways in Cal­i­for­nia: it was a bad day for trans­porta­tion sales tax­es in the San Fran­cis­co Bay Area, and a mixed bag for pro­gres­sive land use and hous­ing pol­i­cy

But Cal­i­for­nia was­n’t the only state with non-pres­i­den­tial elec­tion action, stick around to the end of the posts for the results on a sales tax intend­ed to fund city parks in Okla­homa City.

California

Propo­si­tion 13: A con­tro­ver­sial school facil­i­ty bond appears head­ed for defeat in Cal­i­for­nia. The lead­ing up to the vote was char­ac­ter­ized by mis­in­for­ma­tion on social media, pro­vid­ing a sneak pre­view of the con­tro­ver­sy like­ly to dog a future vote on “split roll” prop­er­ty tax reform in the state, which would change prop­er­ty tax rates for non-res­i­den­tial

San Francisco

Mea­sure E: A crit­i­cal land use reform, cap­ping the amount of office uses based on the deliv­ery of afford­able hous­ing units, was approved by San Fran­cis­co vot­ers. Mea­sure E won hand­i­ly despite the oppo­si­tion of SPUR and oth­er promi­nent fig­ures in the Bay Area. Roland Li pro­vides news cov­er­age of Mea­sure E’s suc­cess

Mea­sure D: A vacan­cy tax for retail uses in San Fran­cis­co appears head­ed for vic­to­ry, reports Adam Brin­klow. “If Propo­si­tion D becomes law, start­ing in 2021 it would charge own­ers of chron­i­cal­ly emp­ty SF store­fronts $250 per lin­ear foot (not square foot) for the year that a retail unit remains vacant, $500 in year two, and $1,000 per foot every year after,” explains Brin­klow.

Mea­sure B: A bond for emer­gency ser­vices and facil­i­ties prepa­ra­tion was over­whelm­ing­ly approved by San Fran­cis­co vot­ers

Mea­sure A: Vot­ers approved a bond, which had the sup­port of SPUR, that will fund $845 mil­lion in repairs at the City Col­lege of San Fran­cis­co. Nanat­te Asi­mov pro­vides news cov­er­age of the bond’s approval

San José

Mea­sure E: A pro­posed tax on the sale of San Jose prop­er­ties worth $2 mil­lion or more was lead­ing on Wednes­day morn­ing with 54 per­cent of the vote, accord­ing to Mag­gie Angst for The Mer­cury News. “The city esti­mates that the new tax, which lead­ers have vowed to use to afford­able hous­ing and expand home­less ser­vices, would gen­er­ate up to $73 mil­lion annu­al­ly and at least $22 mil­lion dur­ing a year,” writes Angst.

Contra Costa County

Mea­sure J: Vot­ers reject­ed a trans­porta­tion sales tax in this Easy Bay Area coun­ty. “Mea­sure J would have imposed a half-cent sales tax to raise $103 mil­lion annu­al­ly for 35 years. It fell far short of the two-thirds per­cent­age need­ed for pas­sage,” reports Rachel Swan [pay­wall].

Marin and Sonoma counties

Mea­sure I: A sales tax to fund the SMART tran­sit failed to achieve the nec­es­sary votes for approval. “Mea­sure I would have extend­ed the Sono­ma-Marin Area Rail Tran­sit dis­tric­t’s exist­ing quar­ter-cent sales tax for 30 years, push­ing the sun­set to April 1, 2059,” accord­ing to Will Hous­ton.

Mountain View

Mea­sure D: A mea­sure to soft­en the rent con­trol ordi­nance in this Sil­i­con Val­ley city was defeat­ed by vot­ers, accord­ing to an arti­cle by Kevin Forestieri. Forestieri char­ac­ter­izes the failed mod­i­fi­ca­tions of the city’s 2016 rent con­trol ordi­nance as most­ly ben­e­fit­ting prop­er­ty own­ers. 

Redlands

Mea­sure G: As of this writ­ing, Mea­sure G in Red­lands, Cal­i­for­nia appears head­ed for defeat, as report­ed by both Bal­lot­pe­dia and Red­lands Dai­ly Facts. As detailed in an arti­cle by cor­re­spon­dence Irvin Daw­id, Mea­sure G would have loos­ened den­si­ty restric­tions to allow for more tran­sit ori­ent­ed devel­op­ment around a forth­com­ing region­al rail line. 

San Diego

Mea­sure C: “San Diego’s high-stakes mea­sure to expand the city’s bayfront con­ven­tion cen­ter — plus guar­an­tee a steady stream of rev­enue to address the home­less cri­sis — was unable to score a win in Tues­day’s elec­tion, falling just short of the two-thirds major­i­ty it need­ed to pre­vail,” report Lori Weis­berg and Gary Warth.

Long Beach

Mea­sure B: A pro­posed of Long Beach’s gen­er­al tran­sient occu­pan­cy (hotel bed) tax rate, from 6% to 7%, had the sim­ple major­i­ty nec­es­sary for approval in ear­ly returns. Hay­ley Munguia pro­vid­ed news cov­er­age of the pro­posed tax increase in an arti­cle pub­lished on the day of the elec­tion.

Oklahoma City

“A mea­sure that would have added a per­ma­nent one-eighth cent sales tax in Okla­homa City was reject­ed by vot­ers,” accord­ing to KFOR, and con­firmed by Bal­lot­pe­dia. The sales tax increase would have raised an esti­mat­ed $15 mil­lion a year for the Okla­homa City Parks Tax Fund.

Did we miss any­thing? Let us know in the com­ments. We’ll be updat­ing this arti­cle peri­od­i­cal­ly as results are final­ized and we iden­ti­fy more rel­e­vant local and statewide elec­tions. 

Source link

Leave a Comment